Normal Lupus Anticoagulant In Blood

Smokers of Yalta

In February 1945 the Second World War was approaching its conclusion on the European scene. Americans and British were opening step in France and Italy went up, and that General Zhukov, east, up to forty miles from Berlin. At Yalta met the three Allied leaders, Franklin Delano Roosevelt , Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin . The three were smokers: smoked cigarettes Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin smoked cigars he smoked in his pipe.

The question may seem anecdotal, even banal. But it began to be curious when you discover that the two leaders in the process of being defeated Nazi, Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini, were in exchange for non-smokers, in fact, authentic anti-smoking zealots.

World War II was fought by tens of millions of highly motivated people, willing to give his life for a cause. This strong ideal content is not easy to find, those who hesitate to ask how that turned out to the Americans in Vietnam, Somalia or Iraq. What was the motivation of the allied fighters? The freedom and democracy, two things are designed in a very real sense. For freedom means the right to dispose of its existence, to assert their identity in the political, social and cultural. But also the right to choose or invent your own lifestyle, without state interference. Democracy was the logical complement of that freedom: if we have the right to be different if we can not be governed as part of a uniqueness facesimo organic. Our form of government has to be a "clearing house" of diversity.

What motivated Nazi fighters? The principles almost symmetrical opposites. Individuality in being loose collective of high status to the single subject of life and history, embodied in the person of the Führer. Politics, society and culture reduced to the universal attributes of this unique subject. Totalitarianism as an institutional form, which considers any criminal diversity.

lifestyle was one of the main areas of this battle between irreconcilable principles. For the Nazis the way of life was to be only one, advocated by the State: "Our body belongs to the nation, our body belongs to the Führer, we have a duty to be healthy" (Robert Proctor, The Nazi War on Cancer , ch. 5). This principle justified the large number of abuses and crimes: the mass imprisonment and murder of Jews, which the regime had transformed into a paradigm of diversity, gypsies, homosexuals, socialists and communists, and hundreds of other unwanted minorities. Others, like the mentally ill, alcoholics and chronic considered carriers of hereditary evil, were sterilized.

Nazism began its campaign against smoking in 1933, when he had got the power (and thirty years before the current U.S. campaign). The first stage was theoretical and propaganda, through research commissioned by the terrifying regime and advertising, many of which bound the smoking habit with the condition of jew. He came to the practical stage in 1939, with partial bans on smoking in public places like government offices, hospitals and places of work, plus the creation of different areas in restaurants and the prohibition of smoking in uniform for the police and SS. In 1940, special coaches were established for non-smokers the railroad. Only in 1943 was the introduction of the smoking ban for children under 18 years, and in 1944 was banned smoking on buses and Metro. But that same year the country lost power, the war was going badly, and to support the morale of the soldiers were sent rations of cigarettes and alcohol to the front, in clear contradiction with the theory of the virtues combative air healthy. The war was lost, and the war ended with the militant antitabachismo. They won the Jews, blacks, smokers and other persecuted

... The fact is that this was the first anti-tobacco campaign of prohibition in the world. The pseudo-scientists largely preceded the Nazis to their heirs of the 50 Americans, the organizers and advertisers Nazis anticipated almost all of the issues and procedures of the prohibitionists in recent years, including "passive smoking" or "second hand" ( Passivrauchen, term invented by the Nazi doctor Fritz Lickint).

Obra Citade: Robert N. Proctor, The Nazi War on Cancer, Princeton U. Press, 1999.

Open Up An Extended Release Pill?

Restless


We took a nice break, but unfortunately, I must say, in order to meet daily at the Simpleton Gaulle must have time, but the normal working people, has a family and has to think a thousand things more serious.
Who can spend all this time to blog? Only those who have cachet millionaires for a night .. or who wants to jump into politics.
Exactly.
a lot of things have happened on the front Simpleton: The VC-day (no, not an error, this should be the more correct abbreviation for fuck-day, and gives a more precise idea of \u200b\u200bthe contents of the initiative) and the descent into the field of Simpleton.
I had some doubts whether to continue with this blog, for those reasons, but now I've rethought.
will be fun to see what they will do the civic lists of Simpleton.
Until next time ...

Does Cervix Swell Right Before Your Period

so thirsty! I do 200 liters of Coca Cola


never really tried to drink 200 liters of Coca Cola, or 100 liters of coffee all at once, or 500 liters of wine per meal, or eat 100 kg. pasta?
You know, certain amounts can be harmful to health, even if Coca Cola, coffee, wine, pasta and of itself is not poisonous .
quantities, in these cases are important.
But for some there is no difference between a and one thousand. That someone is the Simpleton.
appeared in a recent post on his blog reports that a CNR research (based on data of 'WHO) "found no major differences between a gas chamber and the cities of Turin and Milan" .
In fact, the perfect similarity is relevant only to the Simpleton, because the research clearly says something different ( Environment and health in high risk areas)
Obviously the Simpleton refers to the dangerous conditions of pollution of these cities. One of the major pollutants in the air is in fact the carbon monoxide and its carbon monoxide was used once for the gas chambers.
So far, so the comparison holds, but the quantities as stated are important.
Carbon monoxide is dangerous because breathing air containing this gas has the production of carboxyhemoglobin in the blood. When the proportion of carboxyhemoglobin is high compared to hemoglobin, the blood is unable to perform what is its main function: the transport of oxygen to the tissues. The harmful effects of exposure to CO are therefore to be attributed to a lack of oxygen in the blood. An exposure to concentrations of the order of 2000 ppm (parts per million, equivalent to 2300 mg / cu.m) for 15 minutes is fatal. But even a prolonged exposure for several hours at concentrations of the order of 50-100 ppm (57-115 mg / cu m) causes dizziness, headache and general weakness but is not deadly. While prolonged exposure for several hours at concentrations of the order of 10-30 ppm (11-34 mg / cu m) causes lengthening of reaction time and difficulty in challenging physical activity.
In fact, the World Health Organization sets out the following guiding values \u200b\u200bnot to exceed 100 mg / cubic meter averaged over 15 min, 60 mg / cubic meter averaged over 30 min, 30 mg / cubic meter averaged over a hours, 10 mg / m³ averaged over 8 hours. is no fully satisfying the legal limits: 10 mg / m³ not to be exceeded on average over 8 hours - 40 mg / m³ averaged over an hour (maximum).
But in a city like Milan and Turin, the Carbon monoxide is generally below the limits of the law, around 1 mg / cubic meter, far indeed from those 2300 mg / cubic meter of lethal concentrations or even to 10-30 mg / mc that can cause health problems. referred to as a cup of coffee, not a tank.

Source: ARPA Lombardia

Incidentally, the 10 mg of carbon monoxide, which we will never find in a cubic meter of air (the legal limit), we could very well breathe smoke a cigarette.
For someone so mathematics is an opinion, or perhaps entirely remains questionable the truth of the facts.
again about the facts: the concentrations of almost all air pollutants have decreased significantly over the last decades.
E 'enough based on data from the institutions ARPA (Regional Environmental Protection Association). There is only a pollutant that does not seem to fall and ozone.

Source: ARPA Lombardia

How is ozone? a pollutant? But we're not doing anything to reduce the famous hole? but they told us that is so valuable because blocks ultraviolet rays? right, but at high altitude. At ground level, where we live, ozone is a pollutant, in fact, ozone concentrations of 0.1 ppm causes eye irritation, throat irritation and respiratory irritation and dry mouth. just a normal allergy symptoms.
But maybe not ...?
No, No. The ban CFCs! poisoners, destroyers of the environment ... and of 'ozone!

As for the information coming from the CNR, we will deal with soon, because the speech is interesting.

Going Straight Salon Services Price

Beppe Grillo did not read the Biagi law

From Ragionpolitica.it

Francesco Pasquali - June 7, 2007

Against the figure and work of Marco Biagi, there is a ferocious tenacity that should make us reflect. More than five years after his death there seems to be a strategy that would also bury the memory. From the slogans shouted by pro-cowards Brigades internet sites sindacalmovimentisti lying is always the same: the Biagi law has resulted in job insecurity, damaging the younger generation. Even the comedians like Beppe Grillo and Ascanio Celestini, are affected by this obstinacy. In light of the new wave of subversive documents scam as the book published on the blog Grillo , the thundering title "modern slaves" feed hatred and social reality that those banks are in issues related to youth work projects hatch subversive. Not the content of the book that outraged because it is a collection of letters written by young people living a precarious situation. And 'the introduction curated by Beppe Grillo who throws a wrong message, the son of the Biagi law who has never read or has not understood. The cut and the attempt seems to be the same as the short film "The Gospel According precarious" funded by the CGIL a couple of years ago '.

Equation Biagi law = precariousness is demagogic and collides with the reality of numbers. Claiming like the comedian who " the Biagi law introduced in Italy precarious. A modern plague that affects workers, especially at a young age "and that the law has generated ' a subspecies of slaves. Less protected than slaves Southerners "is false and produces social failures. Packing the misadventures of young workers and attributed to the Biagi law because of the widespread unease that young people live is an operation that lacks a sense of responsibility and is symptomatic of those unfamiliar with the topic at all. To bury the lies are the able Genoa the same results (ie the hundreds of thousands of young people who have found jobs and better protection at work) produced by the Biagi law and recognized sources, such as the European Commission, OECD and the Bank of Italy, much more authoritative and reliable and who Grillo writes. Grillo's blog is a success story of online communication and is heavily visited by the young, give him a similar message can be a harbinger of failure. How then wonder of the writing on the wall or mail offensive against Marco Biagi? How can you put out the fire if someone throws gasoline? The issues related to work, since it concerns the life and hopes of the person, should be treated with caution, even more a country like ours where the work is still hostage to the logic of class conflict.

at the expense are properly informed and the young generation, which , expert matadors like Beppe Grillo, the constant quest for notoriety, not to hesitate to feed an alleged offender. Whether the radical left extremism or union to throw mud on the Biagi law is no longer disputed, but the ability to make a character and skill captures the sympathy and confidence of millions of people is serious. We can only hope that the populist Beppe Grillo come back to make us smile back on his feet and rewriting the introduction without the lens of ideology, all aware that at the high media exposure and reputation must be the same sense of responsibility.

Francesco Pasquali

Guillian-barre Verus Myasthenia Gravis

But go to troubled! The cage of one


These days the blog has a letter of Simpleton Marco trammel nets, the only real journalist Left in Italy (so many of his admirers describe him on the net), who returns to complain of media

Dear Beppe, I wish to inform all friends of the blog to the latest news disappearance of a long series. On May 15, 2007 the Third Court of Appeals ruled against Milan forzista Senator Marcello Dell'Utri and the Mafia boss of Trapani Vincenzo Virga 2 years each for attempted extortion. No newspaper, aside from the Kingdom and the Corriere della Sera, wrote it. No news or TV program, except Annozero, he said.

really must be right, Mr. Trammel nets.
I also read about the Corriere almost by chance, and I was very surprised because I knew nothing about the legal mess of Sen. Dell'Utri.
But how was it possible, I I say, and yet I read the papers, I follow the news and when I travel by car I always listen to the news, just has to be right, Mr. Trammel nets.

from non-professionals decide to do a little research, with the means at my disposal.
I'm going to see the press release of the Chamber to find out what the press has been gagged over the years from '98 to find that national newspapers have appeared around 1000 articles on the burden. Dell'Utri, the majority regarding its legal proceedings.
The mystery deepens: and I knew nothing about it?
become curious, but what it refers to the sentence?
is not very difficult to find out, this is written anywhere on the network: in 1990 the Beer Messina Trapani sponsors the basketball to the tune of a billion and a half, but calls for the return of about half of the sum "in black and in cash," as "agreements", the team president of basketball Garraffa Vincent, who refuses.
Marcello Dell'Utri, who had favored Publitalia through sponsorship, is activated to request the payment using also the work of conviction of a local mobster, Vincent Virga.
These are the facts. Indeed not. These are the assumptions of the prosecution. But the defense says what?
looking for information, .. in vain.
not find anything. Possible? releases, news, blogs, online journals, no one showing the other side of the story (correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Trammel nets that the complaints about the press is better than me).
try some article of trammel nets. The only real journalist left in Italy have even made a sound and proper judicial record before firing decisions, or not?
NO.
trammel silent. Never
an article stating the version of the defense.
After a long search to find something in the network, including the parliamentary proceedings http://www.camera.it/_dati/leg13/lavori/documentiparlamentari/indiceetesti/iv/017a/relazione.htm
and through the accounts of radioradicale
http://www.radioradicale.it/schede/view/id=189508/seguito-audizione-testi-garraffa-0 http://www.radioradicale.it/schede/view/id=189517/seguito-audizione-testi-e-dichiarazioni-spontanee-dellimputato-0
leave the reading and vision of these documents to your curiosity.
A little too long because it would make a full account, because some information should be as good food: better to do on their own than relying on ready meals.
I would, however, to extrapolate a phrase from the report of the House who is very curious.

The Garraffa adds: "Virga around, I was aware that he was a mobster, after I told Peter Caruso. However even before I realized that this was the person of respect "

As can be sometimes biased information!

If A Scorpio Is Not Interested

**

A recent article by Giancarlo Loquenzi, editor of online the West, we know what many of us have long suspected: the racism is all on the left.
http://www.loccidentale.it/node/2124 .

Today we had another try thanks to an article in the blog Beppe Simpleton.
http://www.beppegrillo.it/2007/05/la_gabbia_del_leone.html

According to the most authoritative maitre peter to the left (even those unfamiliar with the French can be translated easily the term), the Simpleton precisely, the Rumanian few days ago that killed a woman in Giugliano to steal the car is not guilty of anything, but rather is a victim of the Italian justice has left outstanding as a wild beast.
We may agree with him in charging the inefficiency of Italian justice, but here we instead highlight the proposed fine example of racism. Let
lose all Christian culture, which gives each man a conscience (the Simpleton has shown many times to take little account of that culture), let alone the whole humanist culture and enlightenment, which will give each man a reason, let's forget all that philosophy that gives man a free will and makes it master of its destiny, behold, the Simpleton of all this makes a nice bonfire and seems to have become a disciple of the most vulgar Darwinist or behavioral psychologists, such is incapable of grasping the difference between a beast and a man. That this is recognized
left with each passing day more and more racist (read some of the comments on Article Simpleton to have a confirmation) is not is new and not surprising, knowing the seed from which grew the plant.
But we, Mr. Simpleton, we reiterate our diversity:

for us, every man is free, free, too, not to steal, not free to kill.
And when a man is put behind bars is not to incarcerate a wild beast, but to atone for a crime, according to justice.
Why only men can be guilty, only men can take, and sometimes try to do justice.

How To Do A Limberjack

am a statistical dead

Messages prohibitions of the anti-smoking movement are grotesque, sometimes unintentionally comic. For example, in years when they account for a reduction in the lifetime of the dangers of tobacco. From their calculations it follows that I should be dead, as well as the millions of People who smoke and live happy. Indeed, there should be no smoking live more than sixty years. I look around and find hundreds of cases of smokers over 70, 80 and 90 years living quietly. I try to read the prohibitionist propaganda with the greatest possible objectivity, but it is clear that we are told a lie. Intentionally confuse a statistical risk with a certain risk.

We are immersed in statistical risks, or what is the same thing, surrounded by ominous odds. We can die electrocuted by an electrical appliance (the statistical probability is surprisingly high) nell'autostrada crushed by a truck, killed by a wrong treatment or an infection acquired in a hospital, overwhelmed by the shock caused by the bite of a bee hit by a meteorite in free fall, trampled by a deer on the run, and many other causes of death, each of which has a statistical probability that can be calculated.
To avoid all the risks you should put into hibernation in a vault, and even so ... It seems that the innate risk of death and life, and that the only solution is to live with a great deal of danger, taking special precautions only when the statistical risk is particularly high.

The case is in tobacco? Even if we take for good data prohibitionists (and does not are) we must conclude that it is not particularly high: the next time ask the anti-smoking propaganda that the risk calculations, at least not in years, but the possibility that the event will occur in a particular individual. You will see what a surprise. Obviously, a sensible person would say "it depends", and would do the calculation for fringes of age and health conditions. If you are older than sixty years, and his cardio-respiratory disorders and higher risk, if you are under sixty, and a reasonably good health, your risk is very low, for example.
Of course all these distinctions are far less effective than the words "Smoking Kills" on cigarette packets. If the propagandists antibacco had an obligation to write on the package of cigarettes, not only contraindications, but also the limitations, conditionals, disputes about the data and their credibility to serve rather than a sheet. It would not have the nice effect that these propagandists want to achieve: to scare people to death.