Eternal
opposition (at least post-Adamic era) that divides the inside and the entire male gender: boxers or briefs? Or, to generalize, pant broadband or narrow?
gliding sull'elogio the width of the inner Banananas in SENOnseilonTANA, the controversy can not count only the variables "scrotal compression" and "sensuality". This divides the world too absolutist in dude / fashionistas and hippies / COMODAioli (the categorization is generic and formulaic, but you get the idea). The variables and special cases are numerous.
First, too often joked about the relationship between the width of the pant size and penile omitting unnecessary vulgarity and cutting short on this topic, it is common ground that any tissue that interferes with an erection and, on the other hand, the limp tube coils (grotesque time). The dimesionale component is negligible.
Far more interesting are the mutations that reductional support underwear can be naturally vary with time: the boxer slippizza (turned in on itself the "legs" and causing discomfort groin and thigh rubbing resulting in redness), the slip is perizomizza (resulting from the self-inspection anal newly formed tubule of cotton wrapped). To resolve this problem, it is enough to recover the elastic qualities ergonomic product, which could wear due to improper washing and little noticed. Notably, the special case known as "roll-on effect": if you use a pant / a boxer too elastic waist pants paired with low, there is slipping down the pants and underwear up with references to slippizzazione / perizomizzazione above. The interesting aspect is that the act of repositioning of the trousers is catalyzed the rise of the furnishings of cotton, and repeating the process, you will find trousers to the knees and pant axillary.
Second, you must consider the penile movement: while the slip ensures incellofanamento, the boxer provides the looseness. Is not detectable scientifically what is the best hypothesis: see the proceedings empirical experience of the subject under consideration.
Thirdly, it is important to consider the complementarity between large pant / tight pants with: while a narrow pant easily adapts to any width of the pant, pant in the case of broadband access can refer to steric hindrance, with the formation number of unwanted folds and twisting.
SPIN-OFF: The Thong
Taking a small foray into the world of women, you can refer the dispute of this item use-of-town now. The thong has no containment properties. The thong does not offer added value in security psycho-intima. The thong does not, or at least a few offers, occult properties (for which he was born in Adamic-cf. Bible, Genesis). Involves anal discomfort. Involves irritation of the buttocks due to various frictions.
We must necessarily conclude that its purpose is only an aphrodisiac.
Ordunque what is the point to wear something that you normally see to see him trying not to show it? And finally, would we men are perverse ...
